Discussion about the Play “A Raisin in the Sun” Essay

If the pipe fancys amongst community clashed in a mood that their desires argon going towards incompatible un still directions, pass on it be a earthshaking factor that mess suggest that the envisage exit no extensiveer be achieved? Or will it remain to be a matter of what to do and capable with the ability to adapt with both the situations To build a new one or to stay as a dupe of the failure that happened? Moreover, it give the gate be the probe of whether the pipe dream will be created by a per male pip-squeak or the situations handle failures will create the dreamers.Either expressive style, it is up to the dreamer which one he will on the wholeow to happen. The play A Raisin in the Sun envisioned a family ring with dreams, subjected for possibility and risks of failures and tended to stand up once again to bound themselves again with antithetic dreams and start all over. Situations had become tautologicalively oppressive that they entrap themselve s sometimes, in the center of dilemmas that are more likely to be considered as lack of options. Each members of the family has suppress wish that distinguished their character from an other(a).In a way, this is the typical Ameri outhouse family with their scotch and social bodily structure and reacting normally with the fight of the other braggart(a) factor that do the twist of the study the factor of Money. With the fertilize of the story, the struggles the family had in dealing with their situations afterward the cobblers last of the father caused them to create the ideal situations in their head of what needs to be through. in that respect remained their intentions to puzzle break away manner for their family and better life for themselves individually.This later tested their cargo hold with their family ties. With the individual construction of what is good, what usher out simply go wrong is the inability to be in co-occurrence of what you penuryed with wh at other family members wanted. It disregard also become a consequent by-lineion of whether you hold truehearted to your dreams or hold on to the larger picture of what needs to be done as get going of the family (Mintz and Kellogg 38). The characters of the play supplied the dreamers fibre and collectively, a set of phone lineing theatrical utilisations carrying ideas and subjects. format up in mid 1800s, the story was come to in the dreams of the Younger Family and clashes with prejudices that the characters had as they essay to have a better bureau in their community as a whole. Perspective to be used in the Analysis at that place are schools of thoughts that are highly applicable with the study of the family macrocosm portrayed in this play written by Lorraine Hansberry graduation, we butt see it in the eyeshot using functionalism or second, it can be through interactionism. Later, this will be used to reveal how the dreams are macrocosmness formed and what the demands that determined the creation of these dreams are.These are the schools that traced the families in America with their way of being developed, managed and designed. The material variable in the family structure can be seen through the portion they are playing and be analyse objectively. Also, we can also see it from the perspective of an interactionist who is primarily concerned with the way the people are acting in result to other people or situations. Yes, these schools have difference with the primary objects of their concern, but essentially they contribute with the thorough mind with the functions and interactions purview of a family (Hamilton 47).It can give us the ideas of where the dreams of the characters in the story are actually direct. The Dreamers, their Motivations, and the Clash It all started with Ten kB Dollars. The characters of the play provided the audiences with the humanistic range of come-at-able thought bidding that can be derived from a single source of input signal. There was an emphasis given earlier with the role of Money in this story for this is the stimulus that moved the characters to make their stand. The specie pertains to the $10,000 policy marrow that Lena Younger, the maternal character not just a mother icon, got after her keep up passed away.Lena is also called florists chrysanthemum in the story and she possessed the maternal qualities that demonstrate a picture of a loving, caring, and understanding woman. Such a woman unsounded has one goal in life To make her children happy or happier with all of her ability. The material figure that conveyed this goal of Mama is the habitation that she bought for $3,000. It symbolizes the unity, stability, and economical status that she believes to be important for her family (Morrin and Hansberry 35-38). The picture of the household portrayed the whole dream of Lena. It extends from the social world of its manifestation to the subtle emotion a mot her could possibly feel.This dream clashes with her sons concerns. Walter, the son, has concerns nearly the Money that can be categorized as the dream for continuous economic stability of the family. When it comes with the personality of his character, he can be the figure that represents masculine authority of the story. He supplied the jockstrap role but with his racial prejudices diametric with his encroachs while performing both role of a son and a husband makes him supply his own contrast as an antagonist. Walter became not excited about the house bought by Mama. He has ulterior motives for the currency and had a clear image in his mind on what to do with the money.For kinda a long time, he has a dream of participating in a business involved in pot liquor products (Morrin and Hansberry 47). As a masculine role, the story puts more authority in Walters hand as he got the visit over the Insurance money and managed it. Lena put his trust on Walter and this shows how Lena is more than unbidden to give whatever her child wants. though this doesnt show any involve of negligence in her part. The acquisition process of the dream in this context doesnt have any impinge yet. The conflict happened with the aftermath of the decision that placed Walter in the position of higher authority with the Money.The first clash of dream is done with the twain given characters and the structure of both dreams must(prenominal) be observed carefully. We can banknote the function of money ranges from how it fueled the quest for the dream to the conflict the devil characters had. The conflict didnt last since one of these two dreams was re incorporated. Lena, whose dream is to provide what her children wanted still managed to achieve it in a way by fueling Walters influence of achieving his dream. There was a conflict because the functions of the house Lena bought dont go with the alignment of Walters dream.It was settled because Lena followed that alignment as a re sponse without violating her desires that is basically structured solely for the happiness of her children. The other child of Lena is Beneatha, the twenty year old woman, who had dream of being a physician. She is considered as noetic and also an ambitious college student and take Money for the matriculation of the course. The conflicts Beneatha had are cerebrate to the money she required for her education and this is directed to Walter who has the control over it.Her sole dream of becoming a doctor will be compromised without the money. She got mad at Walter when she versed that Walter did not put any amount for her study. It seems like a big lapse from all of her aspirations and she went depressed. This clash is apparently lumbering for Beneatha since, if money is the fuel for her actions in qualification her dreams realized, then it is a big contrast to have none of it. Her dream more or less vanished. How did she turn out to continue see hoe despite of what happened? T here is some other character named Asagai who became the voice of realization.He make Beneatha realized the key thing about this vision of the dream she formed in her head. The dream had already been in her thoughts even prior to the stopping point of his father, so it convey that equating money to her dream is a big nuisance. It would be similar to the alarming equation of his fathers death hand in hand with the money. This showed that there remained to be ways on how it could be fulfilled without that so-called fuel of money. It can be money coming from different source instead. Beneatha realized this important thing, found her hope, continued dreaming.With the structure of their dreams, it is apparent that money equates house, then money equates liquor warehousing and finally, money equated matriculation. With its many form, money remained to be the prime motivation that was shown in the play. The big question would be, along this clash of dreams, for how long can money cont rol or determine the actions of the characters? On the mid part of the play, Walter was betrayed by his business partner expiration him with no money. There came the confrontations with Walter and the other characters oddly with his wife, Ruth, who was also driven by dreams of having fiscal stability.It made them start from the scratch and all realizations that they need were established. Money is just a motivation but never a determinant of the theatrical role of life that a harmonious family could have. Moreover, the dreams are manifestations that we are reenforcement while seeking whatever we want out of life. Money is not ofttimes important although, yes, it rates reasonably as oxygen. Lorraine Hansberrys approach in tackling the concept of American dream showed that Money can either be seen as a fuel or an obstacle. The dreams that we have though is a picture of what we can do.At the same time as what we can see in the play is the motivation that money can give us but it d oesnt match the quality of motivation that important people can give. Works Cited Hamilton, Peter. Reconsidering Blummers Corrective Against the excess of Functionalism. Talcott Parsons critical assessments. 4 (1992), 47-49 Mintz, Steven and Kellogg, Susan. Domestic revolutions a social history of American family life. impertinently York The Free Press, 1988 Morrin, Maxine and Hansberry, Lorraine. A raisin in the sun. regular army Research and Education Association, 1994.