Argument on Mackie's analysis on existence of God Essay

Argument on Mackies analysis on creation of deity - Essay ExampleOn the other hand, theists continue to defend the stance that perfection exists and can, in fact, coexist with perversive. Mackie challenged theist notions by seeking to demonstrate the invalidity and lack of persuasiveness inherent in regard to the presence of God. The basis of Mackies argument is the provision of atheist criticisms towards theistical assertions regarding the issue of evil in the ground (Geisler 65). However, throughout his argument, Mackie fails to unequivocally prove why the co cosmos of God and evil is a contradiction of the presence of an omnipotent and all good God. Mackies depiction of God is that of a form of god monster that chooses to sit idly despite being aware of the terrible experiences of people in the world as a consequence of his inaction. As a result, Mackie attempts to prove this inconsistency by delving into his understanding of the appetite of an omnipotent being (Geisler 11 4). It is because of this that this paper will critically assess Mackies arguments using a theistic point of view, thereby showing that Mackies argument is incompatible with Gods overall social occasion and his vision for the world. Although God frowns upon evil, he reveres free will, thus does not permit unnecessary suffering. The argument presented in this paper will defend a position that reconciles the presence of God with the presence of wickedness, thus play up the existence of God. ... In fact, evil presupposes Gods existence since God provides a benchmark on which actions can be considered evil or good. Without the presence of God then evil would be nonexistent, because it would be impossible to measure actions as either good or evil. This means that all actions, whether remediate or wrong can be deemed morally neutral since they are performed by individuals who are similarly morally neutral. Therefore, by allowing evil, in the short run, God could be attaining the even tual objective of destroying evil in the long term (Aquinas 626). In Mackies opinion, Gods first priority should be to admonish evil even if it means infringing on peoples free will. Therefore, Mackie appears to presume that Gods actions are negligent since he does not stopover evil. However, such an assumption is likely to imply that God is obligated to do something, but fails to do it. Being an almighty being, God is not compelled to do anything for instance, stop evil since if he was, then this would imply that God is constrained by the desires of another higher being. Ironically, Gods omnipotence is evidenced by his capacity not to destroy evil in order to receive some form of obligation. As an omnipotent and benevolent being, God must have morally enough reasons for allowing the extent of evil in the world (Geisler 37). Despite the amount and types of evil present in the world, a balance also exists such that more good than evil characterizes the world. This makes humans lo ok forward to the hereafter and deem life as worth living. Argument against the existence of God While the argument against the existence of God encompasses a myriad of presumptions, perhaps the