The Universes :: Semantics Language Essays

The UniversesI cant tell you what I was skilful thinking. As in Augustines view of intuition, the associations I registered were too free of whatsoever repeatable limitations for me to verbalize the experience. Perhaps these associations were of diverging thoughts that have not decedent my mind. The most handy example of something similar is the simultaneity of sense perception. each(prenominal) sense perception is specialized and in that respect removed from the building block and yet also registered in the same moment. In the thought Im public speaking of there were different concerns, we efficacy even say a public of concerns none of which I can fully express. This complex event might be considered incidental in regard to what I have wise(p) to value. I am now attempting to acquire a greater grasp of something I cannot verbalize, significationful associations I cant excite a recurrence of through keying words into a com empowerer.Semantic sensation is never original. I t must ever so be familiar. Language does excite original sensations, as in the safe of a speakers voice, and the semantic experience itself is never sound or vision, or any other sense perception of the material universe. accepted experience of semantics would be like immediately comprehending a spoken communication we never hear before. This kind of appreciation is possible with music. Music weve never heard before can be immediately appreciated as music, but semantics, like memory, must unceasingly be a response to what is already familiar.My concern is how to proceed. If I can only register verbally what has already become familiar through cognitive means, my work with language is not directed toward spurring meaning for the first time. Has there ever been a first time in regard to comprehending language? Is anything we read perfectly strange, or is it rather strangely familiar? We may read something and bugger off no sense of it, and later return to it and find familiar ity as if we always should have been able to comprehend this particular passage. This parallels how we initially acquire language through a growing familiarity with the effects of verbal expression. We learn to fortuitously repeat limited effects. We grow to appreciate what we had already experienced albeit as incidental and free of the constraints of communication. Infants can distinguish between phonemes their parents, having learned a particular language, can no longer tell apart (Pinker 264), and meaning is similar in this respect. To understand how this can work we must put aside the notion that language makes meaning.