American Democracy in the 21st Century: A Look into the Effects and Val

I. Introduction to Global LeadershipThe ace who has been entrusted with much, much to a greater extent will be asked (Luke 1248). It is now a clich that America is the mans only superpowernever before, however, has America been so alone at the pinnacle of globular leadership. It is this belief, that the U.S. has assumed the map of globular leadership, which caused American unlike policy to shift from being more isolationist in the mid(prenominal) 20th degree Celsius to becoming infamously characterized by imperialism.Unfortunately, the advanced interpretation of American leadership has been taken to an extreme, where global leadership implies U.S. occupy in and business for virtually everything, anywhere. It is because America clings so tightly onto this quality as the originations police that its foreign policy has make it become tortuous in the affairs of other countries, even when matters of internal security or others are not at stake. The price of global leadershi p cost the U.S in excess of a $600 billion exculpation budget played out to support U.S. aspirations to lead the world, not to defend the coupled States. As American involvement in other nations increases, so declines external support and the authenticity of the U.S.s policy involving itself in serious world-wide affairs.Recently, the United States became conglomerate in yet other conflict which has no direct profess upon its economy or security. As of March, 2011 the U.S. started yet another bombing thrust against a third Muslim nation, Libya, on the cornerstone that its leader aboriginal Minister, and Colonel, Muammar el-Qaddafi was committing human rights violations by attacking his own citizens, who were notably attempting to oust him from his role as Libyas president. The Unit... ... 2011. .Ryan, Julia L, and Kevin J Wu. Profs React to U.S. exponentiation in Libya. The Harvard Crimson. Harvard University, 29 Mar. 2011. Web. 3 Apr. 2011. history-mil itary-granara-libya/.WPO. area Publics Reject US power as the World Leader. World Public Opinion. N.p., 17 Apr. 2007. Web. 3 Apr. 2011. genus Pipa/articles/views_on_countriesregions_bt/ 345.php?nid=&id=&pnt=345&lb=btvoc.Zunes, Stephen. account statement of US-Libya Relations Indicates US Must Tread cautiously as insurrection Continues. Truthout. N.p., 24 Feb. 2011. Web. 3 Apr. 2011. history-us-libya-relations-indicates-us-must-tread-carefully-uprising-continues68 033. American Democracy in the 21st Century A Look into the Effects and ValI. Introduction to Global LeadershipThe one who has been entrusted with much, much more will be asked (Luke 1248). It is now a clich that America is the worlds only superpowernever before, however, has America been so alone at the pinnacle of global leadership. It is this belief, that the U.S. has assumed the role of global leadership, which caused American foreign policy to shift from being more isolationistic in the mid 20th Century to becoming infamously characterized by imperialism.Unfortunately, the modern interpretation of American leadership has been taken to an extreme, where global leadership implies U.S. interest in and responsibility for virtually everything, anywhere. It is because America clings so tightly onto this role as the worlds police that its foreign policy has made it become involved in the affairs of other countries, even when matters of national security or others are not at stake. The price of global leadership costs the U.S in excess of a $600 billion defense budget spent to support U.S. aspirations to lead the world, not to defend the United States. As American involvement in other nations increases, so declines international support and the legitimacy of the U.S.s policy involving itself in serious international affairs.Recently, the United States became involved in yet another conflict which has no direct affect upon its economy or security. As of March, 2011 the U.S. started yet another bombing campaign against a third Muslim nation, Libya, on the basis that its leader Prime Minister, and Colonel, Muammar el-Qaddafi was committing human rights violations by attacking his own citizens, who were notably attempting to oust him from his role as Libyas president. The Unit... ... 2011. .Ryan, Julia L, and Kevin J Wu. Profs React to U.S. Involvement in Libya. The Harvard Crimson. Harvard University, 29 Mar. 2011. Web. 3 Apr. 2011. history-military-granara-libya/.WPO. World Publics Reject US Role as the World Leader. World Public Opinion. N.p., 17 Apr. 2007. Web. 3 Apr. 2011. pipa/articles/views_on_countriesregions_bt/ 345.php?nid=&id=&pnt=345&lb=btvoc.Zunes, Stephen. History of US-Libya Relations Indicates US Must Tread Carefully as Uprising Continues. Truthout. N.p., 24 Feb. 2011. Web. 3 Apr. 2011. history-us-libya-relations-indicates-us-must-tread-carefully-uprising-continues68 033.