Not In My Backyard Attitude Interferes with Resolutions Essay -- Argum

Not In My Backyard Attitude Interferes with Resolutions Not In My Backyard (NIMBY) conflicts have many characteristics that make successful resolutions difficult to achieve. A normal NIMBY conflict, such as a proposal for a landfill come in in a vacant lot behind a low-income housing district, oftentimes carries with it controversial problems of environmental justice, distributional equity, and procedural justice. The public affected by the Locally Unwanted Land Use (LULU) raises questions such as wherefore me? and youre targeting me just beca usance Im a minority. Some people engender out they are affected by a LULU after it is approved, and claim that they had no notification about the proposed project. Another type of problem with land use conflict centers on the local groups opposed to the project. These people, or NIMBYs, are largely underfunded, highly stressed, inexperienced in negotiation, and lacking political index. They want to take part meaningfully in the decis ion-making process about their LULU, but many find it difficult to obtain anything but an adversarial position in the process. Power, status, and wealth are the key attributes to gaining attention and consideration from the broader community. Unfortunately, most public NIMBYs are minorities, unrecorded in rural areas, live in the South, or have middle- to wage-earning incomes (Morris, 1994). In their defense, though, NIMBYs can make harmful land uses difficult to site by creating gridlock on current standard operating procedures.NIMBY groups may bear apart in the middle of the negotiating process, often due to internal power struggles. When this happens, the group tends to lose essential credibility, funding, and support from the greater public, which can start co... ...tor, 1992). Perhaps the LULU risk that the public is hearing from the experts is in incident inaccurate. As a future recommendation for NIMBY conflicts, both the public and skillful community views should be t reated as problematic. Also, there should not be such a stereotypical view of leaders of activist groups as being irrational, over-emotional, or ill informed. Finally, NIMBY activists should see themselves as part of the authority that the project will address, instead of focusing on just the peg down issue of opposing the project. They must see the larger picture and be willing to offer and maybe help implement alternatives to the project.ReferencesFreudenburg, W. R. & Pastor, S.K. 1992. NIMBYs and LULUs Stalking the Syndromes. ledger of Social Issues, 48 39-61.Morris, J.A. 1994. Not In My Backyard The Handbook. San Diego Silvercat Publications.