1. The existent patronage system for snobbish schools         The Howard Government introduced the active backing system for private schools in 2001 during an intense debate. The authentic financial backing system works under the Howard Governments socio-economic situation (SES) model, which measures the socio-economic location of kidrens p bents based on their postcode instead of communicate each(prenominal) parent questions ab away their income. The socio-economic status refers to the parents ability to financi all(prenominal)y keep going their school.         Each private school is given a SES score, which ranges from 70 to 135. Schools with students coming from predominantly high socio-economic areas will ride a higher score and less supporting. The aim of this system is to grant funding on a takes basis. For non- brass schools, most government funding is authorized in a flash from the Common riches. 2. study critical review o f the existing funding system         The major criticism of this funding method is that the system does not take into bill a schools private earnings (eg: fees). As a head of this, the overall trend has been to give the biggest increases to the schools that are obviously amongst the wealthiest. darn under the old ERI system (which measured the schools wealth and schools were set out into 12 categories with Category 1 being the wealthiest) at that keister were some anomalies and problems, the new system is criticised as being unfair, and share the largest increases to the schools that least need them. In the AEU Federal Election occurrence sail (issued April 2004) it shows the 50 schools that received the biggest increases (up to 300% increase). Of the 50 schools which received the highest increases, moreover one was not previously in Categories 1 - 3. No one can justify a 200-300% funding increase for affluent schools that have already got ahead of the i ssue timeworn based on their private fee...!

--References --> When I was younger, some(prenominal) of my parents worked to put me through private school. They paid tuition, for books, for transportation and uniforms. on that point were NO government programs that contributed to the existance of the school, other than the donations through the church service. Now-a-days, the government is giving out vouchers to public school children, whose families can not afford to practice their children to private schools. And who comports for these vouchers? We of course, our task dollars at work. And where does this money come from? Is it the levy moneys we are paying(a) for our own public schools; who by the way, are, for the most part, intricate in debt. There is suppose to be a seperation amidst church and state. It is time our government took public school gold and gave them directly to the public schools. They could then be better fitted out(p) to pay there bills in a timely fashion and utilise good decidated teachers. If you want your child to attend a private school, get a job, second job and if need be, your child can pick up work during the summertime months to help. It is time, we as a society, demand that our government be answerable for all the tax dollars they suck out of our wallets yearly. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.com< br/>If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: !
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment